ext_10214 (
killerweasel.livejournal.com) wrote in
elementarycbs2013-11-14 07:31 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Elementary 2x8
Discussion post for Elementary 2x8 'Blood Is Thicker'.
Spoilers in the comments.
What did you think?
Spoilers in the comments.
What did you think?
no subject
Who the hell was Mycroft talking to??!! I find myself not liking him too much right now! I do like how they continue to make reference to Sherlock's recovery. It has a nice continuity to it. All and all, I thought it was a nice solid episode.
no subject
WHO WAS MYCROFT TALKING TO? I HAVE AN EXTREMELY VERY NOT GOOD FEELING ABOUT THIS.
(JAMIE?)
no subject
Or it could be an associate of hers (e.g., the owner of the male voice who'd talked to Sherlock and Joan at the end of S1; she identified him as one of her lieutenants).
Or it could be a canon nod and be someone else connected to the British government.
I'm also beginning to seriously think that Mycroft, himself, is "M. Holmes", that his father had sod-all to do with sending Sherlock to NYC.
no subject
I looked up Newgate; it's actually in London, so it could easily be her. I really like your idea of a canon nod, though. Mycroft Holmes is supposed to be equally as brilliant as Sherlock himself, so I was a little confused by his portrayal as a more ordinary person; this would make sense. He would be able to cover himself up so well that not even Sherlock would suspect anything.
When I first saw 'M. Holmes', my first thought was that it was Mycroft, so that is very possible, too.
no subject
no subject
Loved seeing Joan take some charge of this case for once. *nods*
Wish Sherlock had mentioned Alfredo, Ms. Hudson, the people at Hemdale, and Alistair (at the very least!) when talking about his support system, though.
no subject
I do hope its a nod to canon.
no subject
Not sure what Mycroft is up to.
no subject
The case was pretty obvious. Again. I'm not sure why it is, that the writers manage to make us care about the main and recurring characters, but suck so much at making us (yes, I should better say 'me') care about the people of the cases at all. The cases and the characters involved in them need some serious work. Although I admit that might be a problem with the format itself. Since this is pretty much the only show of this kind I watch, I can't compare it to others of the genre.
I liked the ending a lot. The last scene with Sherlock and Mycroft was getting way to schmoozy for my comfort, so I was very relieved to find out there was more to it than that. Also, Mycroft's act of the reformed older brother who only wants to reach out to Sherlock would have bored me to tears in the long run. There has to be more to their relationship and difficulties than Sherlock behaving like a petulant toddler just because he wants to. So this promises to be much more interesting :)
Where are Alfredo and Mrs. Hudson? :(
What's up with the eggs, Sherlock? That is a horrible waste of food.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Though it would be a surprising twist if Mycroft had ties to Jamie Moriarty and her criminal empire.
no subject
no subject
It's actually Lestrade on the other end of the phone. He wants Sherlock back so that he can continue his doses of Fame. Mycroft wants Sherlock back for his own reasons but is cooperating since they fall in line with Lestrade's.